You couldn’t get hot for handwriting. And yet he had ... [loc. 1329]
Set in London in 1924. Detective Sergeant Aaron Fowler, of the Metropolitan Police, is approached by his slimy cousin Paul to sort out a graphologist who's wrecked Paul's engagement by accurately reporting, to his fiancee, his infidelity. Fowler drops in on the graphologist, one Joel Wildsmith, expecting to find a con artist of some variety: but he's disturbed, and impressed, by the accuracy of Joel's analyses. (And by Joel himself: but Aaron never acts on his desires, times being what they are.) He devises a scientific test, presenting Joel with a set of handwriting samples -- and Joel's gift reveals a sociopath.
The protagonists are both fascinating characters: Aaron with his Italian heritage, union-firebrand stepfather, aristocratic connections and dedication to his career; Joel, who lost a hand in the War and hates his prosthetic even more than he despises the police (to be fair, he's a victim of entrapment, and the Met is notoriously corrupt), and whose knack for sensing a writer's personality ('I imagine being the person who wrote like that, and then I tell you what I feel like') is spookily accurate. Applause, too, for Detective Constable Helen Challice, one of the first women police officers in the Met, who's routinely handed all the 'women's' cases -- rapes, domestic abuse, paedophilia -- and is determined to remain calm and professional in the face of this onslaught.
As I've come to expect from KJ Charles, this was witty, sexy and very much rooted in the iniquities of the period. Lots of interesting details about London, too: the Indian restaurant, the plethora of mutilated war veterans (and the blandly unsupportive advice given by the Ministry for Pensions), the gangs that more or less run the poorer areas of the capital, the role of newspapers in shaping public opinion, the prejudice and double standards that pervade the Metropolitan Police.
Copper Script isn't (yet?) one of my top five KJC novels: the villain was somewhat two-dimensional, and the denouement felt hasty and downbeat (though it is probably the only happy conclusion that could reasonably be achieved). Still, an engaging and entertaining read, with a strong thread of socialist sensibility.
Minor quibble: a corpse in the Regent's Canal (freshwater, non-tidal) has not spent the night in the Thames...
The author has already had more than 25 novels scraped without payment by AI companies. The author would like AI companies to fuck off. [About the Author, loc. 3392]